Volume 4, Issue 2 (12-2023)
پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023, 4(2): 281-302 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mohajel N, Asghari M. Philosophy of Education and Analysis of the Place of Religious Experience in It. پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023; 4 (2) :281-302
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-257-en.html
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-257-en.html
University of Tabriz
Abstract: (1422 Views)
This article tries to analyze the issue of religious experience and its role and place in the philosophy of education. The issue of religious experience is one of the important issues in the education process in the educational system of a country. Necessarily, in order to understand this issue, one of the methods or philosophical analysis to investigate this issue is the phenomenological method. Religious experience in the field of education and training is a fundamental thing in the education process, but the phenomenological method describes the lived experience from the first-person perspective, and therefore, it is possible to describe and analyze the religious experience of people in the field of education and training with this approach. Basically, learning as the core of education itself is an experience, and phenomenology as the science of analyzing and describing experience is closely related to this. For this purpose, it is necessary to raise the issue of the place of religious experience in education and training, the characteristics of the phenomenological method or approach as well as the types of religious experience and its role in the philosophy of education in general have been mentioned. The main question of this article is how this method can lead us to a better understanding of a person's religious experience in the process of education.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Philosophy
References
1. اصغري، محمد (1401)، درآمدي بر فلسفه¬هاي معاصر غرب، تهران: انتشارت پژوهشگاه علوم انساني و مطالعات فرهنگي.
2. شریعتمداری، علي (1385)، اصول و فلسفه تعلیم وتربیت، تهران: انتشارات امیر کبیر.
3. باقری، خسرو (1390)، رویکردها و روش‌های پژوهش در فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
4. خدیوی، اسداله؛ نامور، رسول (1401)، «رویکرد نظری به فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت اسلامی»، پژوهش های فلسفی، دوره 16، شماره 40، پاییز 1401، صص196-207. https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_15641.html
5. اتو، رودلف (1380)، مفهوم امر قدسي، ترجمه همايون همتي، دفتر اول، تهران: موسسه مطالعات و تحقيقات فرهنگي.
6. شریف زاده، حکیمه السادات؛ باقری، خسرو؛ امیری کاربندی، هادی (1392) «بررسی ماهیت تجربه دینی از دیدگاه آلستون و کاربرد آن در تعلیم و تربیت»، فصلنامه نوآوری¬های آموزشی، زمستان 1392 شماره 48.
7. http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1603196605-10321-99-87.pdf
8. محمدرضایی، محمد (1381)، «نگاهی به تجربه دینی»، قبسات 1381، ش26.
9. رشیدیان، عبدالکریم (1384)، هوسرل در متن آثارش، تهران: نشر نی.
10. مگی، برایان (1372)، فلاسفة بزرگ، ترجمة عزت‌الله فولادوند، تهران: خوارزمی.
11. عبادي، احمد (1395)، «تجربه دینی و گوهر‌انگاریِ آن از منظر غزالی و ویلیام جیمز»، الهيات تطبيقي، دوره 7، شماره 15، 1395، صص109-126.
12. Keast, John (2007), Religious Diversity and Intercultural Education: A Reference Book for Schools, Council of Europe.
13. Smart, Ninian (2005), Phenomenology and religious education K O'Grady - British Journal of Religious Education, 2005 - Taylor & Francis,10.1080/01416200500141249. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01416200500141249 []
14. Van Manen, M. (1997), Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press: Althouse Press. (Original work published in 1990).
15. Asghari, M. (2019) "The Priority of literature to Philosophy in Richard Rorty" in Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Volume 13, Issue 28 - November 2019, Pages 207-219.
16. https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9512.html?lang=en
17. Asghari, M. (2015), "Has Rorty a moral philosophy?" in Journal of Philosophical Investigations, Volume 9, Issue 17, December 2015, Pages 55-74.
18. https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_14934.html?lang=en
19. Hick, J. (2002) An Autobiography; Oxford, England: Oneworld Publications,
20. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (1965), (2002) Trans: Colin Smith. Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [DOI:10.4324/9780203994610]
21. Drummond, J.J. (2022) Historical Dictionary of Husserl's Philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Vote
