reviewing
| Post date: 2022/02/18 |
our review policy and code:
1. all papers reviews would be via double-blind peer-review, which means author(s) and reviewer(s) never know about each other
2. reviewing process should be based on academic principles, do not interfere author opinion, especially about controversial topics.
3. review aim is to assess a quality and authenticity of the work, thus reviewer have to commit to that aim.
4. reviewer should look for arguments and evidences, etc which support the statement.
5. finally, we do philosophy and agreement is rare so let the author think for herself, we just want them to be academic and provide argumnets for thier opinions.
1. all papers reviews would be via double-blind peer-review, which means author(s) and reviewer(s) never know about each other
2. reviewing process should be based on academic principles, do not interfere author opinion, especially about controversial topics.
3. review aim is to assess a quality and authenticity of the work, thus reviewer have to commit to that aim.
4. reviewer should look for arguments and evidences, etc which support the statement.
5. finally, we do philosophy and agreement is rare so let the author think for herself, we just want them to be academic and provide argumnets for thier opinions.
View: 316 Time(s) | Print: 99 Time(s) | Email: 0 Time(s) |
0 Comment(s)
Vote
