Volume 4, Issue 2 (12-2023)
پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023, 4(2): 193-222 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Esmaeili Z, Mohammad Hakkak S. The Position of Induction in John Stuart Mill’s Logical System. پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023; 4 (2) :193-222
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-231-en.html
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-231-en.html
Imam Khomeini International University
Abstract: (1628 Views)
Mill's emphasis on the denial of a priori knowledge caused him, as same as empiricists like Hume, to put a psychological account to explain many of his beliefs. In his opinion, the intellect is a whiteboard on which observation and experience draw patterns. In the next stage, the human psyche gets to work and forces a person to accept repetitive phenomena. This belief is reconfirmed over time and after repeating the monotonies in nature repeatedly; it is as if the discovery of any new law not only proves that law itself but also helps to establish other laws that have been obtained using this method. This research aims to reveal the place of induction in the logic of John Stuart Mill and also show that his efforts to justify induction were not enough. For this purpose, Mill's book” The System of Logic” has been studied and the opinion of some commentators has been expressed about it. During the discussion, Mill's opinion on analogy has been tried to be expressed and finally, a general picture of John Stuart Mill's logic has been presented.
Keywords: Induction, Mill, empiricism, causality, Induction by Simple Enumeration, Induction by Elimination
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Logicaly
References
1. Bain, C., 1904, Autobiography, London: Longmans, Green and Co.
2. Copi I. M Cohen C (1990) Introduction to Logic, Mac Millian Publishing Company.
3. Duncheyn, S Mc Caskey, J. (2014) The Sources of Mill's Views of ratiocination and Induction.In A.Loizides (ed.): Mill's A System of Logic, Critical Appraisals, New York, Routhedge, pp.63-82. [DOI:10.4324/9780203766545-3]
4. Fumerton, R. (2009), Mill's Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology", in Donner and Fumerton, pp95-147 [DOI:10.1007/s11098-009-9401-y]
5. Godden, D. (2017) "Mill on Logic", Macleod and Miller (Eds) A companion to Mill (Ch 12, 175-191) Hoboka, NJ: John Wiley & Sone. [DOI:10.1002/9781118736739.ch12]
6. Jacobs S. (1991) John Stuart Mill on Induction and Hypotheses, Journal of the history of philosophy (29:1)69-83 [DOI:10.1353/hph.1991.0008]
7. Macleod, C. (2014("Mill on the Epistemology of Reasons: A Comparison with Kant", in Loizides pp 69-151. [DOI:10.4324/9780203766545-8]
8. Mill, J. S. (1949[1843]) A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, London.
9. Rayan, A. (1990) The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, 2nd edition, Humanition Press, International, Inc Atlantic Highlands, NJ.
10. Scarre, G. F (1998) "Mill on Induction and Scientific Method", Cambridge Companion to Mill, Edited by John Skorupski, Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CCOL0521419875.004]
11. Skoropski, J. (1994), "J. S. Mill: logic and metaphysics", The Nineteenth Century, Edited by C. L. Ten, Routledge.
12. Synder, L (2009) "Reforming Philosophy: A Victiorian Debate on Science and Society", Chicago University press.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Vote
