year 4, Issue 8 (12-2023)
پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023, 4(8): 105-132 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Qorbani Q. Obstacles Ahead Philosophy of Religion in Iran. پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023; 4 (8) :105-132
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-217-en.html
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-217-en.html
Philosophy Department Kharazmi University
Abstract: (999 Views)
Teaching and researching the philosophy of religion in Iran has faced many challenges and obstacles for three or four decades up to now. Some of them are as follows: 1. Atheistic, western, and Christian backgrounds of the philosophy of religion have caused a kind of pessimism in Iranian religious society. 2. No restraint of philosophy of religion towards theological presuppositions of Islamic tradition that has led to critical approaches to teachings of Islamic tradition, meantime, worries of some religious scholars concerning spreading disbelieving in the result of developing the philosophy of religion due to the role of its rational debates and taking critical or meta-religious approach to religion, has its special importance. 3. Low levels of people’s religious knowledge and dominance of imitation aspect of religious beliefs that are led to more vulnerability of their religiosity due to developing a philosophical approach to religion. 4. Theological presuppositions of religious scholars that have been prevented from welcoming to philosophical approach to religion. 5. Dominance of an exclusivistic approach to our religious tradition has led to deny the merits of other religious traditions that can be possible based on the philosophical study of religion. 6. Historical dominance of jurisprudential approach in Islamic tradition and religiosity that has been caused by the negligence of philosophical and rational approach to religion and to reinforcing imitation of it. The result of the mentioned obstacles is the slow development of the philosophy of religion and its thinkers to many problems and challenges regarding teaching and doing research. Should be added to these obstacles the dangers resulted from misunderstanding some subjects and questions of the philosophy of religion which led to some religious deviations and striking people’s religiosity. There are some ways to remove such obstacles. The best is to separate the theological approach to religion from the philosophical one.
Keywords: Philosophy of Religion, Teaching, Research, Critical Approach, Theological Presuppositions
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Philosophy
Received: 2022/12/13 | Accepted: 2023/02/6 | Published: 2023/06/7
Received: 2022/12/13 | Accepted: 2023/02/6 | Published: 2023/06/7
References
1. استیور، آر. دان (1393)، فلسفه زبان دینی، ترجمه ابوالفضل ساجدی، قم، نشر ادیان، چاپ دوم.
2. پامر، مایکل (1393)، درباره خدا، ترجمه نعیمه پورمحمدی، تهران، انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
3. پترسون، مایکل و همکاران (1383)، عقل واعتقاد دینی، ترجمه احمد نراقی و ابراهیم سلطانی، تهران، انتشارات طرح نو، چاپ چهارم.
4. جوادی آملی، عبدالله (1372)، شریعت در آینه معرفت، قم، مرکز نشر فرهنگی رجا، چاپ اول.
5. خرمشاهی، بهاءالدین (1383)، پوزیتیویسم منطقی، تهران، شرکت انتشارات علمی وفرهنگی، چاپ سوم.
6. سروش، عبدالکریم (1375)، حریت و روحانیت، در: مدارا و مدیریت، تهران، موسسه انتشاراتی صراط.
7. شیروانی، علی و همکاران (1395)، مباحثی در کلام جدید، انتشارات پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه، چاپ دوم.
8. وین¬رایت، ویلیام جی (1390)، فلسفه دین، ترجمه علیرضا کرمانی، قم، موسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی.
9. هیک، جان (1376)، فلسفه دین، ترجمه بهزاد سالکی، تهران، انتشارات بین المللی هدا.
10. هیک، جان (1386)، مباحث پلورالیسم دینی، ترجمه عبدالرحیم گواهی، تهران، نشر علم.
11. Ayer, A. J (1949), Language, Truth and Logic, New York, Dover Publications.
12. Flwe, Antony & Alasdair MacIntire, Eds, (1955), New Essays in Philosophical theology, London, SCM Press.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Vote
