Volume 6, Issue 2 (3-2026)
پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2026, 6(2): 469-500 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moosavi Khoeini A, Mehrnia H. The Place of Reason in the Transition from the Aesthetic to the Ethical Sphere of Existence in Søren Kierkegaard’s Thoughtāṭabāʼī. پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2026; 6 (2) :469-500
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-366-en.html
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-366-en.html
1- Ph.D. Candidate of Philosophy, University of Tehran, Farabi College, Department of Philosophy, Qom, Iran
2- Associate Professor, University of Tehran, Farabi College, Department of Philosophy, Qom, Iran ,hmehrnia@ut.ac.ir
2- Associate Professor, University of Tehran, Farabi College, Department of Philosophy, Qom, Iran ,
Abstract: (214 Views)
This article examines a central aspect of Søren Kierkegaard’s existential thought: the problem of living in accordance with truth, with particular attention to the dialectical relationship between knowledge and will. Kierkegaard’s exploration of how to shape the human self and choose authentically is articulated through his theory of "spheres of existence." A key debate in this context concerns the “transition” from one stage of life to another, and the role of reason in this process. On the one hand, some scholars argue that the transition from the aesthetic to the ethical mode of existence is based on “criterionless choice.” On the other hand, some scholars consider this transition to be a rational decision, with an internalist approach to reasons for action suggesting that deliberation on motivations can bring about the transition. Drawing on Kierkegaard's anthropology, which posits a separation between thought and actuality, and emphasizing his epistemological approach that defines subjective knowledge, this article concludes that, from Kierkegaard’s perspective, the transition to the ethical sphere is rooted in reason. However, this reason expresses only the necessary condition for the transition: passionate will. It does not, by itself, actualize the transition.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Philosophy
References
1. ایونز، سی. استیون (1397)، درآمدی به کرکگور، ترجمۀ اصغر پوربهرامی، تهران، انتشارات حکمت.
2. کرکگور، سورن (1398)، یا این یا آن: جلد اول، ترجمۀ صالح نجفی، تهران، نشر مرکز.
3. کرکگور، سورن (1400)، یا این یا آن: جلد دوم، ترجمۀ صالح نجفی، تهران، نشر مرکز.
4. کرکگور، سورن (1402)، بیماری منتهی به مرگ، ترجمۀ مسعود علیا، تهران، نشر بیدگل.
5. مکینتایر، السدیر (1398)، در پی فضیلت: تحقیقی در نظریۀ اخلاقی، ترجمۀ حمید شهریاری و محمدعلی شمالی، تهران، سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها (سمت).
6. Compaijen, R. (2018). Kierkegaard, MacIntyre, Williams, and the internal point of view. Palgrave Macmillan. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-74552-7]
7. Da Silva, G. F. (2015). "The Philosophical Thesis of the Identity of Thinking and Being is Just the Opposite of What it seems to be." Kierkegaard on the Relations between Being and Thought. In H. Schulz, J. Stewart, & K. Verstrynge (Eds.), Kierkegaard Studies. Yearbook 2015 (pp. 3-20). De Gruyter. [DOI:10.1515/kierke-2015-0103]
8. Da Silva, G. F. (2016a). Contingency/Possibility. In S. M. Emmanuel, W. McDonald, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Kierkegaard research: sources, reception and resources: volume 15. Kierkegaard's Concepts: Tome II: Classicism to Enthusiasm (pp. 67-71). Routledge.
9. Da Silva, G. F. (2016b). Necessity. In S. M. Emmanuel, W. McDonald, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources: Vol. 15. Kierkegaard's Concepts: Tome IV: Individual to Novel. Routledge.
10. Davenport, J. j., Rudd, A., MacIntyre, A. C., & Quinn, P. L. (Eds.). (2001). Kierkegaard after MacIntyre: Essays on freedom, narrative, and virtue. Open Court.
11. Evans, C. S. (2018). Kierkegaard: An Introduction. Translated by Asghar Pourbahrami. Hekmat Publication. [In Persian].
12. Kierkegaard, S. (1985). Johannes Climacus, Or De Omnibus Dubitandum Est: A Narrative. In S. Kierkegaard, H. V. Hong, & E. H. Hong (Eds.), Kierkegaard's writings: Vol. 7. Philosophical Fragments; Johannes Climacus. Princeton University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9781400846962]
13. Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to philosophical fragments: Volume I. Princeton University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9781400846993]
14. Kierkegaard, S., Hong, H. V., & Hong, E. H. (Eds.). (1985). Kierkegaard's writings: Vol. 7. Philosophical Fragments; Johannes Climacus. Princeton University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9781400846962]
15. Kierkegaard, S., Kirmmse, B. H., & Cappelørn, N. J. (2010). Kierkegaard's journals and notebooks: Volume 3. Notebooks 1-15 (Vol. 3). Princeton University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9781400833962]
16. Kierkegaard, S., Kirmmse, B. H., & Cappelørn, N. J. (2014). Kierkegaard's journals and notebooks: Volume 7. Journals NB15-NB20. Princeton University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9781400848218]
17. Kierkegaard, S. (2019). Either/Or: Vol. 1. Translated by Saleh Najafi. Markaz Publication. [In Persian].
18. Kierkegaard, S. (2021). Either/Or: Vol. 2. Translated by Saleh Najafi. Markaz Publication. [In Persian].
19. Kierkegaard, S. (2023). The Sickness Unto Death. Translated by Masoud Olia. Bidgol Publication. [In Persian].
20. MacIntyre, A. (2018). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Translated by Hamid Shahrirai and Mohammad Ali Shomali. Samt Publication. [In Persian].
21. Piety, M. G. (2010). Ways of Knowing: Kierkegaard's pluralist epistemology. Baylor University Press.
22. Schreiber, G. (2016). Transition. In S. M. Emmanuel, W. D. McDonald, J. Stewart, & W. McDonald (Eds.), Kierkegaard Research: Sources, Reception and Resources: Vol. 15. Kierkegaard's Concepts: Tome VI: Salvation to Writing (pp. 185-191). Routledge.
23. Stokes, P. (2016). Consciousness. In S. M. Emmanuel, W. McDonald, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Kierkegaard research: sources, reception and resources: volume 15. Kierkegaard's Concepts: Tome II: Classicism to Enthusiasm (pp. 55-59). Routledge.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Vote
