year 3, Issue 6 (1-2023)
پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023, 3(6): 163-190 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Naseri Z. Skeptical Theism and the Problem of Covid-19 Evil. پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2023; 3 (6) : 7
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-210-en.html
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-210-en.html
Islamic Sciences and Culture academy
Abstract: (412 Views)
Abstract At the end of the era when modern man claims superiority and originality and denies everything he doesn't understand and thinks he doesn't exist and knows himself as the leader in the field of existence and knowledge, a tiny creature called the corona virus intelligently challenges his entire existence. has drawn With the spread of the corona virus in the world, different approaches have been presented regarding the emergence and emergence of such a dangerous virus in the world, and every thinker has analyzed this new predicament of modern mankind from his own perspective.
Why the occurrence and spread of Corona and its new strains as well as its unfortunate consequences in the world in the form of the problem of Corona virus is the issue of this article. In this article, from the perspective of the skeptical theism approach, which is one of the answers given to the problem of evil, we will examine how this approach responds to the problem of corona evil, and on the other hand, how the unknownness and special characteristics of this virus can strengthen the claim of skeptical theism?
Article number: 7
Keywords: Keyword The problem of evil, skeptical theism, corona evil, modern man, man's cognitive deficiency.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Philosophy
Received: 2022/11/10 | Accepted: 2022/12/7 | Published: 2023/01/30
Received: 2022/11/10 | Accepted: 2022/12/7 | Published: 2023/01/30
References
1. Alston, William. (1991 [1996]). “The Inductive Argument from Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition.” In Howard-Snyder (1996).
2. Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, trans., Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Westminster, Md: Christian Classics, 1989.
3. Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, trans., Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Westminster, Md: Christian Classics, 1989.
4. Bergmann Michael, (2001), "Skeptical Theism And Rowe's New Evidential Argument From Evil," Nous 32: 278-296.
5. Davies, Brian, The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil, London and New York: Continum, 2006.
7. Feinberg, John S., The Many Faces of Evil Theological Systems and the Problems of Evil, Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books, 2004.
8. Meister, Chad, introducing Philosophy of Religion, USA and Canada: Routledge, 2009.
9. Perrine Timothy, "Skeptical Theism and Morriston’s Humean Argument from Evil", Sophia, DIO: 10.1007%2Fs11841-018-0656-7.
10. Turner, Denys, “The Darkness of God and the Eucharistic Presence”, Modern Theology, 15: 2, 1999.
11. Turner, Denys, The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
12. Wykstra, Stephen J. (1984). “The Humean Obstacle from Evil.” Internal Journal for the Philosophy of Religion. 16.2: 73-93.
13. Wykstra, Stephen J. (1996). “Rowe’s Noseeum Argument.” In Howard-Snyder (1996).
14. Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne, and Yoaav Isaacs (2016), "Evil and Evidence," Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, No. 7, p. 1–31.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Vote
