In the phenomenology of Husserl, subjectivity is important as a prior necessity, insight, and a self-evident in our consciousness, hence it’s not produced or cleared as content. Does it mean Husserl ignored subjectivity and its value as content in human minds? If it's not, how we have owned it? Or is it the subjectivity placement inside an object or against it? Neither! Because both of them may mislead us. We aren't the subject or its owner, we only select a single type of concept and delimit it by subjectivity. It's not a probabilistic action, because we only separate a concept from others, then introject it as a predicate without every content. After all, there are empty and it’s only stimulate our sensibility without every new data. In this paper, we change our point of view from the primacy of the subject to the object’s effect on consciousness as the sphere of ownness, between us and other things or other minds.