Ali Vakili, Hosein Atrak,
Volume 4, Issue 1 (5-2023)
Abstract
One of the most complex and important issues in philosophy is its absence and rulings. This article tries to address one of the controversial questions in this chapter, that is, the realization and objectification of non-existence, from some philosophers’ point of views, and finally answer it with the foundations of Mulla Sadra. In Mulla Sadra's opinion, sometimes absence is opposite to existence and sometimes it is symmetrical to existence. The absence that stands in front of existence is nothingness and pure nullity, but the other means the lack of perfection, symmetrical and accompanied by existence; Therefore, among the early and late sages, both meanings have their own supporters, and the author believes that the dual fundamental theory of the existence and nature of Mulla Sadra can be considered as the chapter of the discourse of this conflict. Therefore, the author's new approach in this article aims to prove it by criticizing and reviewing the opinions of a number of supporters and opponents of the realization and objectivity of not focusing on Mulla Sadra's opinions, with a descriptive-analytical method.
