Reorganization of the Epistemic Network of Religion and Reason in the Tradition of Islamic Philosophy Based on the Dynamic Model

Author
10.22034/mi.2026.8532
Abstract
This research examines the epistemic structure of religion in the tradition of Islamic philosophy, demonstrating that Muslim philosophers’ use of religion is not as a static and homogeneous source but rather in variable relations with reason and intuition. Such a relationship sometimes leads to functional dispersion and epistemic heterogeneity in the works of Muslim philosophers, to the point where identifying a "stable epistemic core" for religion becomes a complex and ambiguous issue. To resolve this ambiguity, this paper proposes a model called "Epistemic Dynamics," which conceptualizes religion not as a closed epistemic system but as a dynamic process in continuous interaction with rational faculties and intuitive experience. This model, by providing a systematic framework, is capable of explaining both the historical differences and diversity in philosophers' interpretations of religion and also facilitates the reconstruction of a kind of epistemic coherence within Islamic philosophy. In this way, the "Epistemic Dynamics" approach offers a new perspective, enabling the overcoming of long-standing tensions and challenges between reason and religion, and shows that the epistemic structure of religion in the tradition of Islamic philosophy should be recognized as a dynamic and dialectical process, in continuous synergy and interaction with reason and intuitive experience.
Keywords

19- Aristotle .(1985). On Dreams, Translated by J. I. Beare, in: The complete works of Aristotle, Edited by Jonathan Barnes, New Jersey: Princeton university press.
20- Balbiani, P., Herzig, A., & Troquard, N. (2019). Dynamic epistemic logic: From public announcements to logics of communication and change. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 28(2), 115–140. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2017.1416036
21- Baltag, A., Moss, L. S., & Solecki, S. (1998). The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In Proceedings of TARK (pp. 43–56).
22- Gärdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23-Malinowski, Jacek, 2021, A Semantics for Hyperintensional Belief Revision Based on Information Bases, , Studia Logica, Volume 110, 679–716, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-021-09973-y
24-Wisnovsky, R. (n.d.). Avicenna and the Avicennian tradition. In Adams & Taylor (Eds.), Cambridge Companion (pp. 92–136).
25-van Ditmarsch, H. P., van der Hoek, W., & Kooi, B. (2007). Dynamic epistemic logic. Springer.
26-Velázquez-Quesada, F. R. (2014). Dynamic epistemic logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition).