Volume 6, Issue 1 (8-2025)
پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2025, 6(1): 97-128 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rabipour F, Fath Taheri A, Baqershahi A N, Heidari M H. A Study of the Conception of Truth in Deleuze’s Reading of Kant. پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2025; 6 (1) :97-128
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-324-en.html
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-324-en.html
1- Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2- Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran ,fathtaheri@hum.ikiu.ac.ir
3- mam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2- Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran ,
3- mam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract: (381 Views)
Deleuze’s philosophical project begins with his reversal of Kant’s philosophy. His unique interpretation of Kant serves as the foundation for his broader ontological framework. Throughout his works, Deleuze consistently connects the concept of truth to other philosophical ideas, often reinterpreting entire systems to reconstruct truth in innovative ways. Yet this reconstruction always unfolds in dialogue with, and in critique of, Kant. According to Deleuze, since Kant’s aesthetics has been marked by an irreducible duality: on one side, it refers to sensibility as the condition for possible experience; on the other, it refers to art as the expression of actual experience. This split produces two competing “images of thought,” which in turn give rise to two divergent conceptions of truth. In the first conception, the faculties naturally and voluntarily orient themselves toward truth, representing it as universal and general. In the second, thought emerges only when external forces disrupt the faculties, making truth the outcome of real experience and the creation of something new. This study explores Deleuze’s account of this dual concept of truth, situating it within his special engagement with Kant, and clarifies how this framework enables the production of the new.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Philosophy
References
1. دلوز، ژیل(1392)، بیان و تکینگی در لایبنیتس، ترجمه پیمان غلامی و ایمان گنجی، تهران: انتشارات رخداد نو.
2. دلوز، ژیل(1401)، جهان اسپینوزا، ترجمه حامد موحدی، تهران: نشر نی.
3. شکورزاده، پریسا؛ فتح طاهری، علی؛ حسامی‌فر، عبدالرزاق (1401)، مفهوم «معنا» در منطق معنای دلوز، پژوهش¬های فلسفی، 16(40)، 428-407. [DOI:10.22034/JPIUT.2022.52158.3254]
4. مشایخی، عادل(1396)، دلوز، ایده، زمان: گفت و گویی دربارة ژیل دلوز، تهران: ناهید.
5. مهدوی‌آزادبنی، رمضان (1404)، پیامد ذهن‌شناسی کانت با تکیه بر نظریة مطابقت، پژوهش¬های فلسفی، 19(50)، 193-204. [DOI:10.22034/jpiut.2024.61635.3765]
6. Deleuze, G. (2004), Desert Island and other texts, ed. Sylvere Lotinger, trans. Michael Taormina, New York: Semiotext.
7. Deleuze, G. (1995), Difference and Repetition. Trans. Paul Patton. Columbia University Press.
8. Deleuze, G. (1984), Kant's Critical Philosophy, the Doctrine of Faculties, trans by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
9. Deleuze, G. (2000), Proust and Signs: The complete Text, trans. Richard Howard, University Of Minnesota Press.
10. Deleuze, G. (1994), What Is Philosophy? Co-authored with Felix Guattari trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell, Columbia University Press.
11. Gualandi, Alberto (1998), Deleuze, Paris: Les Belles Lettres. [DOI:10.14375/NP.9782251760117]
12. Kant, I. (1952), Critique of Judgment, trans. James Creed Meredith, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, Trans and Edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511804649]
14. McMahon, (2009), "Immanuel Kant" in Deleuze's Philosophical Lineage; Edinburgh University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9780748631957-008]
15. Plato, (2018), The Republic, trans. Tom Griffith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Plato, (1975), Philebus, trans. J.C.B. Gosling, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Smith, D. W. (2012), Essays on Deleuze. Edinburg University Press. [DOI:10.1515/9780748643349]
18. Willat, E. & Lee, M. (2009), Thinking between Deleuze and Kant, New York: Continuum.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Vote
