year 2, Issue 3 (Spring and Summer 2021)                   پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2021, 2(3): 7-34 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zarei Z. Analysis and Study of Suhrawardi's Theology with Regard to Mullasadra's Critiques. پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی 2021; 2 (3) :7-34
URL: http://mi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-106-en.html
Kharazmi University
Abstract:   (802 Views)

The subject of philosophy is absolute existence,, which encompasses other levels, from the Supreme Being to the last levels of existence.The center of existence and the series of beings, which is often interpreted as obligatory, is known in the philosophy of illumination as the "Noor al_Anwar". Suhrawardi in his enlightenment system, after proving "Noor al-Anwar" and his unity, negates the superfluous attributes of that field. He has also offered a novel view of his science and action.Although Mulla Sadra considers his «Gotham sediqin» on the obligatory proof to be close to Suhrawardi's argument, but considering the validity of existence in Suhrawardi's philosophy, he has considered Ibn Kamuna's doubt on his method of obligatory proof.Regarding science and other attributes of God, he has either criticized Suhrawardi's speech or has adopted different opinions with him in some details. In the present article, while expressing Suhrawardi's views on this subject, Mulla Sadra's differences and criticisms against him have been discussed.

Full-Text [PDF 314 kb]   (312 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Philosophy
Received: 2021/06/11 | Accepted: 2021/12/1 | Published: 2021/12/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC-BY-NC-ND 

Designed & Developed & copyright of web platform: Yektaweb