<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Metaphysical Investigations</title>
<title_fa>پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی</title_fa>
<short_title>پژوهش های مابعدالطبیعی</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://mi.khu.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2783-2198</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2783-2198</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/mi</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1405</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2026</year>
	<month>4</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>1</volume>
<number>1</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>fa</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa>Challenges Facing the Critical Approach to Theological Systems</title_fa>
	<title>Challenges Facing the Critical Approach to Theological Systems</title>
	<subject_fa>فلسفی</subject_fa>
	<subject>Philosophy</subject>
	<content_type_fa>مقاله پژوهشی</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;div style=&quot;direction: ltr;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:normal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Aptos,sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;Theological systems encompass religious texts, believers&amp;#39; interpretations of these texts, and the religiosity of the faithful. Among the significant challenges to adopting a critical approach to theological systems are: the failure to distinguish between religious texts, religious knowledge, and religiosity; the dominance of exclusivist views of religion; extreme sanctimoniousness; the spread of religious populism; the prioritization of rituals and ceremonies over religious beliefs; personality-centric religiosity and neglect of the main message of religion; emotionalism and excitement-driven attitudes; the prevalence of imitative over investigative perspectives; and the professionalization of religion. Examining these challenges, identified inductively, helps us gradually transition from a dogmatic and non-critical view of theological systems to a critical and dialogue-oriented approach. Such a shift marks the beginning of accepting the reality of critique in the realm of religion and theological systems, leading to significant advancements.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:normal&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Aptos,sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;font-family:&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;Theological systems encompass religious texts, believers&amp;#39; interpretations of these texts, and the religiosity of the faithful. Among the significant challenges to adopting a critical approach to theological systems are: the failure to distinguish between religious texts, religious knowledge, and religiosity; the dominance of exclusivist views of religion; extreme sanctimoniousness; the spread of religious populism; the prioritization of rituals and ceremonies over religious beliefs; personality-centric religiosity and neglect of the main message of religion; emotionalism and excitement-driven attitudes; the prevalence of imitative over investigative perspectives; and the professionalization of religion. Examining these challenges, identified inductively, helps us gradually transition from a dogmatic and non-critical view of theological systems to a critical and dialogue-oriented approach. Such a shift marks the beginning of accepting the reality of critique in the realm of religion and theological systems, leading to significant advancements.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa>Theological Systems, Religion, Religious Knowledge, Religiosity, Exclusivism, Sanctimoniousness, Dialogue.</keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Theological Systems, Religion, Religious Knowledge, Religiosity, Exclusivism, Sanctimoniousness, Dialogue.</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://mi.khu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-32-12&amp;slc_lang=fa&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Qodratullah</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Qorbani</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa>قدرت الله</first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa>قربانی</last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>qodratullahqorbani@khu.ac.ir</email>
	<code>10031947532846002493</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846002493</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Kharazmi University</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>دانشگاه خوارزمی</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
